
Kiribé Editor
July 9, 2026
2 min read
Two years after the 2023 stoppage, the industry is still adjusting to the terms it produced — and to the ones it didn't.
Two years on from the 2023 actors' guild strike, the industry is still working through the implications of the agreement it produced. The AI provisions, in particular, have been the subject of ongoing negotiation at the individual-production level, and the guardrails that were locked into the master contract have proven both meaningful and incomplete. Most productions are complying; a small but visible minority are testing the edges.
The residuals framework is the piece of the deal that has performed closest to expectations. Streamer residuals now include a viewership component that has generated meaningful payouts on shows that would have earned nothing under the previous flat-rate model. The formula is complicated, and there have been a handful of high-profile disputes about how viewership is calculated, but the principle has held.
The AI provisions have been the more contested piece. The contract requires informed consent and specific compensation for any digital-double work, and it prohibits fully synthetic performances without prior authorization. In practice, several productions have quietly tested the boundaries — background-crowd generation, voice-doubling in ADR, and de-aging work that arguably crosses the digital-double line. The guild has filed three grievances in the past year and won all three. That is a durable precedent but a slow enforcement mechanism.
The counter case, from the studio side, is that the strike settled the wrong problems and left the biggest ones for later. Streaming windowing, per-title greenlight authority, and the fragmentation of the international residuals market were all treated as second-tier issues in 2023. They are, by most accounts, the top-tier issues now, and the current contract does not have adequate provisions for any of them. The next negotiation will be more contentious than the last one.
For actors themselves, the practical effect is mixed. Middle-tier working actors report modest income improvement, largely driven by the residuals structure. Top-tier actors are largely unaffected. Below-the-line performers — background, stand-ins, ADR work — are the group most exposed to the AI provisions and the group with the least individual leverage. The union will need to address that gap in the next round if the strike is to be considered a durable structural win.
Tags
Share
Kiribé Editor
Editorial Desk
Published by the Kiribé editorial desk, covering culture, cinema, and the intersection of art and society across the African continent and beyond.
Read next

Studio consolidation news
Two mid-tier studios announced a merger this week — the third such move in eighteen months, and probably not the last.

Cannes jury shortlist reactions
The final week's screenings produced a compressed shortlist and an unusually noisy set of industry reactions.

A24 signs multi-picture deal
The distributor's new three-year commitment locks in slate depth and signals a shift in mid-budget commissioning.
Join the Conversation
Stay Ahead of the Story
Subscribe to Kiribé for premium entertainment journalism, exclusive interviews, and cultural commentary delivered weekly.